Monday 23 December 2013

New Zealand Prisons Infographic


New Zealand has long been regarded as one of the most desirable countries in which to live. Early in 2013 the Canadian based Fraser Institute rated as the most 'free' country in the world by. In other studies, New Zealand has also been said to be the country with the least corruption and was rated 2nd on the world global peace index. Yet beyond the sparkling reputation and international accolades New Zealand hides somewhat of a dark underbelly when it comes to crime and the number of people we have locked up in our prisons. New Zealand lies a shocking 8th in the OECD when it comes to the number of people per capita behind bars, just behind Mexico and Poland and more than a third greater than its nearest neighbour Australia.


In creating this infographic, I hope to draw some attention to a number of the troubling aspects of the New Zealand prison and justice system. Firstly the amount of crime that goes unreported - two out of every three crimes according to the 2009 New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey of 6000 people, with the numbers for incidents such as domestic abuse and sexual crimes said to be much higher again. When it comes to crimes that are actually reported, the police's success rate at solving crime is not great either - only 47%, though this number varies greatly depending on the type of crime. Homicide for example has a success rate of over 92% at the top end of the scale while at the other end, only 14% of reported burglaries are solved by police.
The huge amount of money spent, not just on the cost of keeping people in prison, but on the corrections budget as a whole is shocking too - more than what the country spends on early childhood education - ironically one of the things that could actually help keep our kids from ending up in jail in the first place.


The most shocking statistic when it comes to the prison population itself has to be the massive over-representation of Maori. Maori make up less than 15% of the general population, yet make up over 50% of population of New Zealand's prisons, a number which has risen by 10% since 1981. Pacific people are also over-represented but nowhere near to the same degree.

The real problem with statistics like these however, is what they're not showing - the real stories behind the numbers. If these stories were told I imagine what they would tell us is that a very high percentage of the people in our prisons are from low socio-economic backgrounds, have limited education, have likely been subject to or witness to domestic and other violence or abuse, addiction, unemployment, broken families and often have relatives either in gangs or in jail or both. Lives lived a far cry from the idyllic New Zealand many people perceive.

The New Zealand Ministry of Health recently revealed that 64 per cent of prisoners in New Zealand have suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) at some point in their lives (compared with just 2 per cent of the general population). Other studies have put the rates of TBI's even higher - and for Maori prisoners, some studies have put that rate has as high as 90%. The effects of a traumatic brain injury have been associated with an inability to recognise the consequences of your actions, an inability to resist impulses, and a lack of recognition of what is appropriate behaviour, all things likely to lead them back into trouble with the police and the justice system.



Another aspect that is very hard to quantify is what role European colonialism has had on the place of present day Maori in New Zealand society. The forced moves away from traditional ways of living into a comparatively disconnected - and in many cases poor -urban environment has taken its toll on many families and has lead to intergeneration problems as it has in other native cultures around the world. A comparison of  Maori imprisonment rates with other indigenous populations that have gone through the effects of European colonisation - Native American Indians in the USA and Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders in Australia - actually shows that rates of Maori imprisonment are lower than either of them, and in fact far lower than the numbers of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders in Australia - where the imprisonment rates are appalling. It should be mentioned that the numbers for Native Americans could well be skewed by the overall high imprisonment rates in the USA (see 'How Does New Zealand Compare' graph).

Finally the question of whether New Zealand's prisons are working. If the goal of our prisons is to rehabilitate prisoners, then it seems we are failing miserably, particularly when it comes to our youngest prisoners. The recidivism rates for prisoners aged under 20 at the time of release are shocking - 88% will have been re-convicted of a crime within the following 5 years and 77% will have been sentenced to more time in prison. The rates do slowly improve as prisoners get older, but even then the numbers are not pretty.


It seems then that by the time you get to prison it may already be too late to turn things around for the vast majority of prisoners. Perhaps then the best chance we have of changing this cycle would be to focus our efforts on improving the lives and the chances of at-risk youth before they begin heading down that road.

This won't be easy and will require a multifaceted approach that brings out into the open what is going on in many families in the poorest parts of our society and makes it okay to talk about and confront these issues. There needs to be government policies that target the reduction of poverty and societal inequalities, the stemming of intergenerational abuses and addictions, more avenues of support for families that are struggling and the improving of access and engagement in education from early-childhood onwards. 

These changes and policies will not be simple and will require long term cross party support and an end to the use of crime, tougher sentencing and benefit bashing as political footballs when election campaigns roll around. There is already good work being done both in our prisons and out in the community but these efforts need much greater governmental support if real long term progress is going to be made and we are going to give at-risk youth a vision of a future beyond gangs and a life of crime.



Notes: The statistics contained in this infographic have mainly been taken from the most recent data available on the corrections website - mostly from 2011 and 2012. Other statistics such as the recidivision rate is from a study conducted between 2004-2009. The number of prisoners currently in jail is taken from August 2013.


I would highly recommend the short Al Jazerra documentary Locked Up Warriors which gives a great insight into the lives of current, former and possibly future New Zealand prison inmates.

Resources:

Monday 9 December 2013

When the Cost of Free Trade is Too High

New Zealand has been involved in the negotiations over the content of the TPPA (Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement) since 2010. The details of the negotiations and the content of the agreement have been kept secret from the public by the parties involved and it is only through recent leaked documents that the public have been able to get some idea of what is being negotiated. There has been widespread concern about what has been found in those documents and there have already been numerous protests going on in New Zealand and around the world over what is at stake for the countries involved.

Prime Minister John Key's has responded to the protests with what now seems to be his standard - don't worry about it, I know best - reply - “The people that are opposed sometimes are just opposed to free trade and they live in a world that doesn't want to see New Zealand intersecting globally with the rest of the world,” says Mr Key. “They’re entitled to their view but in my view they’re wrong… I think people should ignore them."

However despite Key's assurances and the attempts to keep the negotiations secret, it seems now widely known that the US holds the upper hand at the negotiating table and is pushing for all sorts of concessions on the part of large corporations that will effect laws already passed in New Zealand, the ability of future government's to make new laws, the ability of future governments to regulate the economy and the prices we pay for many our goods and especially our healthcare.

A few of the contentious areas current under negotiation are:

Investor–state arbitration - giving foreign companies the ability to challenge local laws in a privately run international court - this could include things like environmental laws (regulating emissions, laws that protect endangered species etc) and health regulations (cigarette packaging, fatty foods, food labelling laws - including the labelling of genetically engineered food etc). This is something that Canada signed up under the NAFTA agreement and is having to deal with lawsuits by companies like Exxon-Mobil Dow Chemicals and Eli Lilly in regards to Canada's laws on fracking, off-shore oil drilling, patients, pesticides etc.

The removal of banking regulations - The US is pushing for regulations that stop the use of 'capital controls' to regulate their economies. This would include things like the recent regulations introduced to cap low deposit lending and cool the housing market - in other words banning countries from introducing regulations that could have prevented the global financial crisis. It would also also limit a countries ability to stop capital outflow during a financial crisis - taking away one of the few ways a country has to limit the damage once it starts.

New copyright laws - The TPPA could force New Zealand to introduce new laws around copyright that would force internet providers to police their own users (something New Zealand has already rejected), making copyright infringement a much more serious crime and making unintentional copyright infringement a serious crime also. This part of the agreement could also seriously undermine current internet freedoms, for example forcing websites to take down pages before any infringement is proven and forcing the owner to pay to prove their own innocence. These new laws could also end up costing schools and libraries a lot more.

Intellectual Property - The intellectual property part of the agreement includes the extension of patient laws on pharmaceuticals, keeping the price of medicines higher for longer. The US is also attempting to limit or remove the governments ability to use Pharmac to negotiate for lower drug prices.

Parallel importation - The United States is pushing for regulation making it illegal to import goods that are sold much cheaper elsewhere in the world for resale in New Zealand - likely pushing up the prices of many goods for all New Zealanders.

International Investment - Possible removal of abilities to limit foreign investment and ownership of New Zealand.

While it is slightly reassuring that that latest revelations in the Huffington Post show that New Zealand (along with most other countries) is currently rejecting many of the contentious parts of the agreement, the USA has shown little flexibility in all of these areas. Given the superior bargaining power of the US and the fact that New Zealand and the other nations involved are pushing for a final draft agreement before Christmas, it seems obvious that for anything to be completed on time, New Zealand with have to make major concessions in many of the areas they are currently rejecting and in that case John Key's reassurances hold very little water.

There does seem to be simple (thought perhaps not easy) answer to the current impasse - remove both the contentious areas from the agreement along with the country pushing for them all to be included. The US wasn't part of the original group of countries negotiating the TPSEP and given they are the country creating the majority of the problems, there seems little doubt that the remaining countries would be better off without them.

Edit: January 14th 2014
I found this discussion between Bill Moyers, Yves Smith and Dean Baker particularly enlightening and it raises the question of whether the TPP really has anything to do with free trade at all... 


Resources:

Friday 9 August 2013

100 Percent Pure Bullshit

August 10th, 2013

New Zealand has for more than a decade now been using the slogan "100% Pure" and marketing itself as "clean and green" in a seemingly successful campaign to attract tourists and boost it's trade with the rest of the world and in some cases to even charge a premium on those exports. While many kiwis may already be well aware that these images have little basis in reality, it seems that this week's Fonterra milk powder contamination scandal has opened the window to the rest of the world as well.

An article on Reuters this week talked about the sad state of many of New Zealand's rivers and the fact that New Zealand is the only OECD country that does not produce a regular national report on its environment.

Another editorial published on the Chinese news website Xinhua talked about the poor standard of New Zealand's housing and called the 100 Percent Pure brand a "festering sore".

While this may end up being very damaging to New Zealand's international branding, perhaps the saddest thing about all of this is that the reality goes far beyond the reporting in either of these articles. If they looked just a little bit deeper into New Zealand's clean green image they would find a country with carbon emissions that have increased (since 1990) at a rate second in the world only to Turkey. A country that pulled out of the Kyoto protocol and was the only developed nation not to submit a 2020 emissions reductions target to the United Nations. A country with government that has decimated it's Department of Conservation, is proposing changes to the resource management act that favour business over the environment, has allowed coal mining on the Denniston Plateau land despite the danger to endangered species and is currently looking to massively expand both fracking and deep sea oil and gas drilling despite the scientific evidence linking them directly to global warming. They would find a country that was even awarded a Colossal Fossil award at the 2012 Doha climate change conference and was described as demonstrating "exceptional blindness to scientific and political realities.... in a campaign of extreme selfishness and irresponsibility."

I guess it's no wonder John Key has compared New Zealand's '100% Pure' campaign to McDonalds' 'I'm Loving It' and said it needs to be taken with 'a pinch of salt'.

The problem Key has now is that once people start seeing that there is nothing to back up the slogans and marketing campaigns the dollars he seems to love so much are likely to dry up along with our reputation.

Maybe then it's time to gave up on the marketing campaigns for the moment and start working towards restoring this country to a place that could be honestly marketed to the world as being clean and green without the need for a pinch of salt.


References:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/06/us-newzealand-milk-image-idUSBRE97503H20130806http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald/news/communities/8757926/RMA-changes-a-threat
http://www.rtcc.org/2013/08/06/frustration-grows-at-new-zealands-climate-change-coma/#sthash.HEdiQCVb.dpuf
http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/campaigns/save-the-denniston-plateau-ours-not-mine

Wednesday 7 August 2013

A Continuing List of Things That Don't Make A Lot of Sense




December 10th, 2013

John Key is about to lead a small delegation of New Zealand politicians to South Africa for the memorial service of Nelson Mandela. Why that delegation includes two members of the National Government led by Robert Muldoon who labeled Mandela a terrorist and allowed the 1981 Springbok tour to New Zealand and no one from the groups that organised the protests against the tour is beyond me.

When the Prime minister can't even man up about his own feelings towards apartheid at the time of the tour, the question has to be asked whether he is really the person that should be leading the New Zealand delegation in the first place. A response of 'I can't be bothered going into it' tells me he probably is not.

More here: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/yasmine-ryan/apartheid-new-zealand_b_4411734.html



______________________________________________


August 8th, 2013

Apparently the White House said last Thursday that it is “extremely disappointed” in Russia’s decision to grant National Security Agency leak source Edward Snowden temporary asylum in the country, casting it as a setback in the countries’ bilateral relationship.

That seems perhaps just a touch hypocritical given Russia and the US have no extradition treaty and the fact the the US have routinely refused to extradite people facing much greater charges (including genocide and war crimes) even to countries they do have extradition treaties with... more here


______________________________________________

July 29th, 2013

Judith Collins has always struck me as someone who is pretty sure of herself, which kinda makes her tweet today all the more disturbing: 


"So anti-GSCB hackers have closed down Government MPs websites proving what they could do to people's bank accounts."

Taking two unrelated things and deciding one somehow proves the other is not the best look, particularly when you are the Minister of Justice.



___________________________________________

July 23rd, 2013

John Key conveniently forgets that fossil fuels cause global warming and decides to base New Zealand's economic future on them...


Tuesday 6 August 2013

John Key Sells Two Houses and Solves Child Poverty in a Single Blow!


May 29th, 2013

John Key celebrates solving New Zealand's child poverty problem 
with Minister of Labour Simon Bridges


The government announced on Tuesday that it would be Funding a food in Schools program to the tune of 9.5 million dollars over the next 5 years. Unfortunately 1.9 million dollars per year does not go very far when you have 270000 kids* in New Zealand living below the poverty line.
My maths make that about three and a half cents per school day per kid, or around a dollar per classroom and the last time I looked a box of Weet-Bix was about 5 bucks! Of course it doesn't really matter if kids don't eat breakfast on the days when they aren't at schools because you don't really want them learning anything form their deadbeat parents anyway right?

Strangely enough, if the government was looking for a way to fund the program these two state houses in Sandringham sold in March for exactly the same amount the government is planning to spend per year and given that the government owns more than 50,000 state houses, it looks like our child poverty problem is solved for at least the next 25,000 years!

Well done John!

I do have slight questions over the choice of Weet-Bix and milk for breakfast given that milk was recently discovered to be the most common food allergy for kids in New Zealand with wheat not too far behind...


* Figure from the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty